performance:turbocharging
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| performance:turbocharging [2020/04/15 19:25] – ben | performance:turbocharging [2020/04/29 02:56] (current) – ben | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| It's pretty important to keep charge air temperatures down on a 3800. Switching to a turbo makes this pretty simple and can easily net a lot of power just by converting a supercharged car to turbo with the same boost pressure. An intercooler is definitely recommended as well. | It's pretty important to keep charge air temperatures down on a 3800. Switching to a turbo makes this pretty simple and can easily net a lot of power just by converting a supercharged car to turbo with the same boost pressure. An intercooler is definitely recommended as well. | ||
| - | ===== Turbocharging vs the M90 Supercharger | + | ===== Turbo Sizing |
| - | Consider that a stock L67 with an M90 produces 240 horsepower at the crank at 8 psi.\\ | + | Generally when picking |
| - | A turbocharged L67 without an M90 will produce 300 horsepower at the crank at 8 psi and can consistently reproduce that without | + | |
| - | An M90 will also struggle to produce more than 10 psi without introducing | + | Too small of a compressor on the turbo will result |
| - | A turbocharger tends to be more efficient at higher speeds so it can easily produce a much lower temperature air charge at higher levels | + | |
| - | A 3800 with a stock cam and no engine mods can easily | + | Too large of a compressor could result in a turbo that needs a lot of rpm to spool up and create boost, or in the worst case scenario could cause compressor surge. |
| + | |||
| + | Too small of a turbine housing would cause extremely quick spool times, but would choke the motor from making power in the higher rpm ranges. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Too large of a turbine housing would cause very laggy spool times. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every turbo will be different in the amount of power it can make and how quickly it will spool. Turbocharger technology has come a long way since the 90's so a more modern turbocharger might be a better option than an older design. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Generally a good street | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Other Considerations on Turbo Selection ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Bearings ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Generally most older turbochargers will use a journal bearing that only requires oil to lubricate and cool the bearings. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Newer turbos will use ball bearings in the compressor housing and will typically use engine | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | A ball-bearing turbocharger with a billet compressor wheel will spool faster and have more room to make power than a similarly sized journal bearing turbo. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Compressor Wheel ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Some turbos will also have billet aluminum compressor wheels that will help speed up the spool times due to the decrease in rotating mass. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Other main factors that can improve spool times are: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * variable vane technology usage | ||
| + | * twin-scroll turbine housings | ||
| + | * size of the turbine housing and turbine itself | ||
| + | * A/R ratio of compressor and turbine housing | ||
| + | * camshaft selection | ||
| + | |||
| + | However there a lot of other things that play a big factor here as well. This are just some of the more commonly discussed heavy hitters. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Resources ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https:// | ||
performance/turbocharging.1586978736.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/04/15 19:25 by ben